World News

Investigation of Trump documents: Court lifts Mar-a-Lago record hold – Times of India


Washington: Deny Donald once and for all playing cards.
The three-judge ruling of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit was a resounding win for the Justice Department, paving the way for investigators to continue to scrutinize the documents as they consider whether to criminalize their retention. was opened.After Trump left the country, a top-secret record White HouseBy removing the hold on core parts of the Justice Department’s investigation, the court removed an obstacle that could have delayed the investigation for weeks.
The appeals court also noted that Trump did not provide evidence that he declassified classified records, denying the possibility that Trump had a “personal interest or need” in the nearly 100 documents. .seized classification sign FBI Searched Palm Beach property on August 8th.
“If you’re the president of the United States, you can declassify just by saying ‘It’s declassified.’ Even by thinking about it. You’re the president, and you make that decision.”
The government claimed that an order from U.S. District Court Judge Eileen Cannon blocked the investigation and cleared national security concerns. Trump’s nominee Cannon said her suspension would stand pending another review by an independent arbitrator she appointed when asked by Trump’s team to review the record. had said.
The Appeals Committee agreed with the Department of Justice’s concerns.
“It is self-evident that the public has a keen interest in ensuring that the storage of classified records does not cause ‘very serious harm to national security,'” they wrote. “To make that claim, you would have to review the document, determine who accessed it and when, and determine which sources or methods (if any) were compromised.”
An injunction that delays or impedes a criminal investigation, they write, “uses classified material at risk of causing real and serious harm to the United States and its people.”
Two of the three judges who delivered Wednesday’s ruling were Britt Grant and Andrew Brasher, was named to the 11th Circuit by Trump.judge Robin Rosenbaum nominated by the former president barack obama.
Trump’s attorneys did not return emails seeking comment on whether to appeal the ruling.The Justice Department did not immediately comment.
The FBI seized nearly 11,000 documents, including about 100 classification marks, during a court-sanctioned Palm Beach club raid last month. It’s unclear if Trump will be indicted or if someone else will, but a criminal investigation has been launched into whether records have been mishandled or compromised.
On September 5, Canon will appoint an independent arbitrator or special master to independently review these records and determine any that may be subject to claims of attorney and client privilege or enforcement privilege. Separated and one of the materials should be returned to Trump.
Raymond DearyHe is a former Chief Justice of the Brooklyn-based federal court.
The Justice Department has argued that no special master review of classified documents is required. He said the records could not be covered by attorney-client privilege because they did not include interactions between the parties.
It also challenged Cannon’s order requiring Dearie and Trump’s lawyers to provide access to classified materials. The court sided with the Justice Department on Wednesday, saying, “The court should order review of such material only in the most extraordinary circumstances. The record does not permit the conclusion that this is the case.” ” he said.
Trump’s attorneys say the president has absolute authority to declassify information, but they do not claim the records have been declassified. The Trump campaign this week resisted providing Dearie with information to support the idea that the records may have been declassified, saying the issue could be part of its defense if indicted. rice field.
The Justice Department has said there is no indication that Trump has taken steps to declassify the documents, and one court filing was marked with a colored cover sheet indicating that it was classified. It included photographs of seized documents.
“Plaintiff has suggested that he may have declassified these documents when he was president. However, the records do not contain evidence that any of these records were declassified. No,” the judge wrote. “In any case, at least for these purposes, the declassification argument is akanishin, because declassification of official documents does not alter or make their contents private.”





Source link

Show More

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Back to top button