The Cabinet will actively appeal to about 3,000 companies that emit large amounts of nitrogen to stop their activities or make them sustainable. The amount they could receive from the buyout could reach his 120% of the company’s value. Sources close to the cabinet confirmed this after reports by AD and De Telegraaf.
The regulation stems from advice from politician Johan Lemkes, who last summer acted as mediator in a bitter conflict between the cabinet and much of the agricultural sector. In his recommendations, Remkes recommended that within a year he would work on 500 to 600 of the largest sources of peak nitrogen emissions.
Most are farms, but there are also industrial companies. A business does not necessarily have to completely close down to be eligible for such schemes. Widespread sustainability changes or relocation away from vulnerable natural areas are also possible.
The scheme aims to provide nitrogen space so that some companies under pressure from a May 2019 State Council ruling can legally carry out their operations. As a result, thousands of businesses suddenly needed to obtain permits they didn’t need before. By freeing up space for other companies to release nitrogen, you can smoothly obtain permits for construction and infrastructure projects.
Farmers’ activist groups Farmers Defense Force (FDF) and Agrakti say it is paramount to make sure the decision is voluntary. Agractie chair Bart Kemp said Tuesday that he had “constructive conversations” with the ministers involved, particularly Christianne van der Wal (Nature and Nitrogen), Piet Adema (Agriculture) and Mark Harbers (Infrastructure and Water Management). said he did.
In his initial reply, Kemp said, “We’ve made progress both in terms of process and content, and it’s about time.” But Kemp is critical of the possibility of the Cabinet imposing tougher environmental requirements on farmers who want to continue farming. “We are categorically against any form of coercion,” he stressed.
The FDF questioned how it determines which companies are considered peak emitters. According to the Action Group, “crooked assumptions” have been made about this.
Johan Vollenbroek of the environmental group MOB said it would be “in principle good” if the cabinet took steps to reduce the number of livestock. “The question is whether it’s enough,” he said. One question is whether the approach can expect approval from the European Commission, he warns Vollenbroek.
“Will bought farmers get a professional ban? Because Brussels won’t accept being bought here for a lot of money if they buy large farms in East Germany to continue. is.”